When the Church Stops Mourning Sin

1 Corinthians 5:1–2: “It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you, and such sexual immorality as is not even named among the Gentiles—that a man has his father’s wife! And you are puffed up, and have not rather mourned, that he who has done this deed might be taken away from among you.”

Sin can enter the church. The church is made up of redeemed people who are still being sanctified, so we should not be surprised when believers struggle with sin. But when sin enters the church, it is never a small matter to be taken lightly.

The situation in Corinth was particularly grievous. Paul had received a report that a man in the church was involved sexually with his father’s wife. The sin was public, scandalous, and apparently ongoing. Yet as serious as the man’s behavior was, Paul’s concern was not limited to his sin. There was also something terribly wrong within the church.

Paul says, “And you are puffed up, and have not rather mourned.” The man was sinning through his immorality, but the church was sinning through its toleration of that immorality. Instead of confronting what God had clearly condemned, they were “puffed up.” They apparently thought their response was appropriate, but they were following their own judgment rather than submitting to the Word of God.

That is an important warning for us. We can convince ourselves that ignoring sin is the loving thing to do, but God says that confronting sin is the necessary thing to do. If we are not careful, we can call something compassion that God calls disobedience. Love does not require us to pretend sin is insignificant. Biblical love desires holiness, restoration, and obedience to Christ.

Perhaps the most searching phrase in this passage is this: “have not rather mourned.” Paul says that instead of being arrogant, they should have mourned. That word is striking. Paul doesn’t merely tell them to disagree with the man’s behavior. He says they should grieve over it. Sin in the body of Christ should break our hearts.

There are three ways they should have mourned. First, they should have mourned because God had been dishonored. Sin is first and foremost against God. When Christ’s people openly practice what Christ condemns, His name is dishonored.

Second, they should have mourned because of the man’s spiritual condition. Church discipline was not intended simply to punish him or get rid of a problem. His willingness to remain in serious, unrepentant sin should have caused the church to fear for his soul. Genuine love does not watch someone walk toward destruction and say nothing.

Third, they should have mourned because his sin was harming the church. Paul will shortly warn that “a little leaven leavens the whole lump” (v. 6). Tolerated sin does not remain isolated. Like cancer in the body, it spreads its destructive influence. When a church knowingly permits unrepentant sin, it gradually changes what that church considers normal and acceptable.

Therefore, Paul says the man must be removed from their fellowship. That sounds severe to modern ears, but Paul’s concern is ultimately redemptive. The church must take sin seriously because it takes God seriously, and it must confront the sinner because it loves the sinner too much to affirm him on a path of destruction.

When was the last time we mourned over sin? When was the last time our own sin genuinely grieved us—not merely because we were embarrassed or suffered consequences, but because we had sinned against the God who loves us? When was the last time the spiritual condition of another believer caused us to grieve and pray for that person’s restoration? And when was the last time sin within the church broke our hearts because we understood what it does to the holiness, testimony, and spiritual health of Christ’s body?

There is a sobering warning here: when we knowingly ignore unrepentant sin in the body of Christ, we become participants in the church’s disobedience. There is a difference between patiently helping someone who is struggling against sin and tolerating someone who has settled comfortably into it. The Corinthian church was doing the latter.

Our culture teaches us to minimize sin. Our flesh teaches us to excuse it. Sometimes even churches learn to tolerate it. But Scripture teaches us to mourn it, confront it, repent of it, and seek restoration from it.

The church should be a place where sinners find grace—but grace never teaches us that sin does not matter. Grace teaches us just how serious sin is, because nothing less than the blood of Jesus Christ could cleanse us from it.

Prayer: Father, give us hearts that see sin as You see it. Keep us from becoming comfortable with what dishonors You. Teach us first to mourn our own sin and quickly repent of it. Give us courage and love to care about holiness within Your church, not with pride or self-righteousness, but with humility, grief, and a genuine desire for restoration. May we never become so accustomed to sin that it no longer breaks our hearts. In Jesus’ name, amen.

When Hope Becomes Hype: Guarding Against Cultic Eschatology in the Pre-Tribulation Tradition

Throughout church history, eschatological expectation has been both a catalyst for holiness and a crucible for error. From the Montanist movement of the second century to the Millerites of the nineteenth century, anticipation of Christ’s return has at times fostered spiritual excess and social upheaval (Encyclopedia Britannica, 1998).[1] In recent years, a resurgence of end-times enthusiasm, fueled by social media, political uncertainty, and cultural anxiety, has given rise to movements claiming prophetic insight into the timing of the rapture or tribulation. While most evangelicals who affirm a pre-tribulation rapture do so within the bounds of orthodoxy, some of these movements exhibit behavior characteristics of cultic systems. These behaviors include Continue reading →

Be Fruitful

John 15:16, “You did not choose me, but I chose you and appointed you that you should go and bear fruit and that your fruit should abide, so that whatever you ask the Father in my name, he may give it to you.”

In his Systematic Theology, Charles Ryrie writes concerning this verse, “Believers have been chosen to bear fruit; not to do so would be contrary to God’s purposes.” Ryrie considers fruitlessness a sin. This is an important point to understand. While Ryrie points out the negative aspect of fruitlessness, namely that it is sinful, Jesus states the truth in the positive, namely that the Christian life was designed by Him to be fruitful. He states that we are chosen, that we “should go bear fruit.” The Christian life was meant to be fruitful. Or stated another way,

Continue reading →

The Great Deceiver, Chapter 4: The Battle for Significance

“You say that I am a king. For this purpose I was born and for this purpose I have come into the world–to bear witness to the truth. Everyone who is of the truth listens to my voice”     John 18:37

No one likes to be disciplined. I remember getting in trouble in third grade. I don’t recall what I did at school, but I have a vivid memory of my dad’s response. He sat me down and asked me what I did. While I don’t recall what it was, I do remember lying to my dad about it. That was the only time my father laid a hand on me. It hurt. I did not like being corrected. But it had a very positive effect. I don’t lie. I learned that lesson at a young age. And I learned that lesson because I had a father who loved me enough not to let me get away with lying. His love cured me of that sin.

Today, many people are looking for love. But, as the song goes, they are looking for love in all the wrong places. Over the last few years, I have developed a bit of a twitch whenever someone has the radio tuned to a contemporary Christian station. I actually love much of the contemporary music, but I can’t say the same for the announcers and commentary between the songs. I have come to affectionately refer to these stations as the Cult of Encouragement. These radio stations ooze encouragement all over your car, out of the window, and down the street. As the ooze slithers down the road, in my review mirror, I think I even once saw it rise up, raise something like a hand in the air, and a voice said, “You are loved! Yeah!!”

Now, before you accuse me of being an Ebenezer Scrooge, hear me out. I am all for encouragement – when it is appropriate to give it. And, I am all for people hearing that God loves them. But,

Continue reading →

Time to Choose!

There are a lot of competing voices in our culture concerning the gay marriage issue. Who you listen to will make all the difference in how you decide where you stand.

People in positions of influence will make statements like, “My moral code is a matter of faith,” or “I don’t have the right to impose my moral code on you,” or “You can’t legislate morality,” or “I am not always right, and neither are you.” Comments such as these seem to possess a kind of wisdom.

Let’s briefly consider the above ideas. First, morality is not a matter of personal preference. The source of all morality is God. True morality, the type that leads away from sin, is a reflection of God’s holy character. He, in fact, demands that we obey his moral code as revealed in His law. God’s law is not something that is given to us as a suggestion. It’s not a preference. He revealed it to the world and commands that all must obey it; and He reveals that it is this law under which all will be judged.

Second, when understood correctly, law is morality legislated. That’s the whole point. If you support something legally,

Continue reading →

You’re What?!

Resist the urge to be offended. There are many in our culture today who are offended at everything, and they feel compelled to tell you how offended they are. We have entered an age where not being offended is seen as a right, and being offended makes one a victim. Unfortunately, many people have been truly hurt by the “victims” of those who offend.

However, if you are a Christian, before you jump on the bandwagon of cultural sensitivity, claiming to be offended by what someone says or does, just consider a few things.

  1. To make the claim that you are offended means that you have climbed the lofty perch of righteousness. You have arrived at the superior moral plane where your refined moral sensibilities have elevated you above your peers. Hence, when you claim to be offended, you are looking down upon the groveling mass of ignorant plebes who have no right to disturb your sense of peace and well-being. They can’t possibly know what it’s like to live with such a refined sensitivity towards what is truly right, proper, just, and good. Just the suggestion that you enter into their filthy little world by trying to understand why one might say or do something that you can’t possibly be associated with is an outrage! You see, the burden is for such people to become sensitive to how righteous you are, and then make sure that, when in your presence, they act accordingly.
  2. To make the claim that you are offended means that you have climbed the soaring heights of intellectual superiority. You are offended precisely because they are ignorant, stupid clods who should have immediately understood that, in your presence, the only appropriate response is to listen and learn. Speaking about things that are contrary to your exceptional intellectual acumen is not only insulting, but suggesting that you should condescend and spend time with such people is absurd!
  3. To make the claim that you are offended means that you have assumed the towering post of an existential existence that necessarily places you in the top tier of ontological reality. As Isaiah was confronted with the majesty of God (see Isaiah chapter 6) upon entering His presence, so too, those who enter yours should have a similar response. And, if they, too, should appropriately humble themselves before you, then you can bestow your magnanimous mercy upon them.

Ok, that may seem like a bit much, but

Continue reading →